[Although she is still speaking with some attitude, her voice does soften a tiny bit, it may be easy to miss though...]
Because you're taking away someone's right to decide to help or not. Stripping them of their free will. No one will respond to someone demanding to be helped. It kinda defeats the whole purpose of it being known as that.
[She was the queen of sting though. Reason she doesn't respond to that part of his question. It wouldn't be the first time someone calls her a moral absolutist or worse, really.]
no subject
[Although she is still speaking with some attitude, her voice does soften a tiny bit, it may be easy to miss though...]
Because you're taking away someone's right to decide to help or not. Stripping them of their free will. No one will respond to someone demanding to be helped. It kinda defeats the whole purpose of it being known as that.
[She was the queen of sting though. Reason she doesn't respond to that part of his question. It wouldn't be the first time someone calls her a moral absolutist or worse, really.]
Honestly, it just comes off as condescending.